Zach believed directness built trust—but his version of “clarity” came across as conflict. Through Blindspotting Coaching, he learned that communication isn’t just about being honest; it’s about being heard. By pairing truth with timing and tone, he turned tension into trust and learned to lead with both courage and connection.
Zach was a senior executive known for getting results. He was confident, fast-moving, and unafraid of hard conversations. His motto: “Clarity is kindness.”
But his team didn’t feel the kindness part. They braced for every one-on-one and stopped challenging his ideas.
To Zach, he was being efficient—cutting through the noise to keep things moving. To his team, he was unpredictable, intimidating, and exhausting. He wasn’t trying to be harsh; he just believed honesty worked best delivered straight.
His intent to drive accountability was landing as criticism and control. That’s the paradox of communication blindspots: you don’t experience the tone you give—others do.
Zach’s Behavioral Blindspot was a mismatch between intent and impact.
He saw himself as transparent. His team experienced him as abrasive.
His communication pattern was built on confrontation as connection—a belief that pushing people made them stronger. What he couldn’t see was how fear had replaced motivation.
His directness, once a strength, had overgrown its container. It was clarity without context, challenge without care. He wasn’t wrong to want high standards; he just couldn’t see that how he delivered them determined whether people would follow.
Read more about the Behavior Blindspot.
In Blindspotting Performance Coaching, Zach learned that good communication isn’t just about what’s said—it’s about how and when it’s said.
His coach helped him slow down and observe the signals he was missing: body language, silence, tone shifts, and disengagement. They introduced a simple but powerful tool: metacommunication—talking about the conversation as it’s happening.
Instead of opening with directives, he began naming his intent:
“I want to push this idea a bit, but my goal is to strengthen it—not to shut anyone down.”
He practiced building trust before challenge, and feedback before evaluation. He learned to ask questions first, then offer perspective:
“What’s your thinking behind this?” before “Here’s what I’d change.”
Over time, he discovered that empathy and efficiency weren’t opposites—they were sequential. Connection first. Then correction.
The shift didn’t take long to show. Within weeks, meetings felt lighter. His team started volunteering ideas again. Conflict became collaboration.
One teammate told him, “You still challenge us—but now it feels like we’re on the same side.”
Even the CEO noticed the difference. “He’s still direct,” she said, “but now people listen instead of brace.”
Zach didn’t lose his edge. He just learned to use it with precision. When he led with clarity and care, people finally heard what he meant to say all along.
Zach’s story reminds us that truth without trust doesn’t lead anywhere. The goal of communication isn’t to win the conversation—it’s to preserve connection while telling the truth.
When intent and impact align, feedback builds strength instead of resistance.
Think about your last tough conversation. Did the other person leave clearer—or smaller? Was your message understood, or just heard?
Clarity is powerful. But clarity without empathy can sound like criticism instead of guidance.
Explore Blindspotting performance Coaching
